Before the U.S. Supreme Court in Castillo v. U.S. (2000)

“Stephen Halbrook is an attorney with extensive knowledge of the historical underpinnings of the Second Amendment and practical knowledge of litigating in this rapidly evolving area of law. His writings include topics as diverse as Gun Control in the Third Reich and The Founders’ Second Amendment, and he was heavily involved in Heller and McDonald.”

– U.S. District Judge Michael J. Reagan
Shepard v. Madigan, 2014 WL 4825592, *7 (S.D. Ill. 2014)

Supreme Court Practice

Comments on ATF Regulation Proposals

Practice Areas

Gun Control Act/National Firearms Act

  • Firearm technical classifications
  • ATF regulatory compliance
  • FFL warning conferences, license denials,
    and revocations
  • Forfeitures
  • Legal disabilities and restoration of civil rights
  • Criminal defense

State and Local Laws

  • “Assault weapon” restrictions
  • Legal status of firearms
  • Challenging restrictions

Civil and Criminal Cases Litigated >>

1968 Hearings on GCA Regulations

Books

Congressional Testimony

X
X
X
slide4

Scholarly Articles

“How a Fake Citation Misled Courts to Uphold ‘Sensitive Place’ Gun Bans,” 2 Journal of Law & Civil Governance at Texas A&M 433 (2026).

“Birthright Citizenship Requires Parental Allegiance to the United States: The Meaning of ‘Subject to Its Jurisdiction’ in the Fourteenth Amendment” (October 27, 2025).

“The Power to Tax, the Second Amendment, and the Search for Which ‘“Gangster” Weapons’ to Tax,” 25 Wyoming Law Review No. 1 149 (2025) (Special Issue: The National Firearms Act).

“Textualism, the Gun Control Act, and ATF’s Redefinition of ‘Firearm’,” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy: Per Curiam No. 32, (Summer 2024).

“Text-and-History or Means-End Scrutiny? A Response to Professor Nelson Lund’s Critique of Bruen,” 24 Federalist Society Review, (Mar. 15, 2023).

“The Second Amendment Was Adopted to Protect Liberty, Not Slavery: A Reply to Professors Bogus and Anderson,” 20 Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 575 (2022).

“Право народа на хранение и ношение оружия: вторая поправка билля о правах сша” [“The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms: the Second Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights”], 2 Ukrainian Law Journal “Law of the USA” (2013), 240-50.

“The Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms: the Second Amendment in the U.S. Bill of Rights,” 2 Ukrainian Law Journal “Law of the USA” (2013), 240-50.

“Banning America’s Rifle: An Assault on the Second Amendment?,” 22 Federalist Society Review (June 28, 2021).

“Virginia’s Second Amendment Sanctuaries: Do They Have Legal Effect?,” Regent University Law Review, No. 2, 277 (2020-2021).

View More Scholarly Articles >>

Second Amendment Roundup at The Volokh Conspiracy

“Saving Lives at Silver Rail Elementary,” The Volokh Conspiracy, October 19, 2026.

“‘Sensitive Places’ Issue Coming to a Head?,” The Volokh Conspiracy, October 15, 2026.

“Bruen’s Footnote 9 Not a Carve-Out from Text and History,”The Volokh Conspiracy, September 29, 2026.

“5th Circuit En Banc to Rehear Felon Gun Ban Cases,” The Volokh Conspiracy, September 17, 2026.

“ATF’s ‘Firearm’ and ‘Frame or Receiver’ Rules Invalid,” The Volokh Conspiracy, September 9, 2026.

“1st Volley of Briefs Filed in Viramontes,” The Volokh Conspiracy, September 7, 2026.

“The Militia of the Sea,” The Volokh Conspiracy, August 12, 2026.

“$0 Tax Left NFA with No Constitutional Basis,” The Volokh Conspiracy, August 9, 2026.

“New Jersey Rifle and Magazine Bans Bite the Dust,” The Volokh Conspiracy, July 22, 2026.

“Seventh Circuit Decides Barnett,” The Volokh Conspiracy, July 16, 2026.

“Cert Granted on Semiautomatic Rifle Bans,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 30, 2026.

“Supreme Court Decides Wolford,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 25, 2026.

“Gun Ban for Pot Users Unconstitutional,” The Volokh Conspiracy, June 18, 2026.

View More Op-Eds and Short Articles >>

Op-Eds & Short Articles

TV Appearances

X
slide3
slide5
slide6
slide7
slide8
slide10
slide11
slide12

Presentations

Huge NFA Victory Breakdown with Stephen Halbrook – Four Boxes Diner (Aug. 18, 2026)

Stephen Halbrook on How the American Revolution Had a Lot to Do with Gun Control – NRA, “Voices of the Second Amendment (Atlanta),” (Jun. 8, 2025)

Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Garland v. Cargill – The Federalist Society, (Mar. 5, 2024)

Attorney Stephen Halbrook Discusses the Upcoming Supreme Court Case Garland v. Cargill on Whether Bump Stocks Are Machine Guns – The Federalist Society, “A Seat at the Sitting: The February Docket” (Feb. 15, 2024)

Attorney Stephen Halbrook Talks SCOTUS Re: Biden “Ghost Gun” and “Weapons Part Kits” – Four Boxes Diner (Aug. 13, 2023)

The Case for the AR15 – The Republican Professor (Aug. 1, 2023)

Attorney Stephen Halbrook Breaks Down Current Pistol Brace Fight – Four Boxes Diner (May 22, 2023)

A Year After Bruen, and This Is Happening? – America’s First Freedom (May 20, 2023)

ATF OVERREACH: Stephen Halbrook on How ATF Rules DO NOT = LAW; Defeating the ATF in Court – The Dana Show with Dana Loesch (Mar. 28, 2023)

View More Presentations >>

Instagram Updates

"Tombstone, Territory of Arizona, passed Ordinance No. 9 in 1880 making it 'unlawful for any person to carry deadly weapons, concealed or otherwise (except the same be carried openly in sight, and in the hand) within the limits of the City of Tombstone.' It then amended the ordinance in 1881 to make it 'unlawful to carry in the hand or upon the person or otherwise any deadly weapon within the limits of said city of Tombstone, without first obtaining a permit in writing.'

"Town marshal Virgil Earp allowed his brothers and friends to violate the law but he enforced it against his enemies. The trouble started when Wyatt Earp pistol-whipped Tom McLaury for not checking in his gun, and before long the Earp brothers and Doc Holliday shot dead three cowboys who refused orders to turn in their guns. Wyatt Earp and Doc Holliday were charged with murder, but the case was dismissed.

"The Tombstone homicides were not exactly an inspiring showcase for bans on carrying firearms. While folks evaded the ordinance by carrying concealed arms, Tombstone was not a violent town; there were only three homicides with firearms in town that year, and the decedents were the cowboys shot by the Earps and Holliday in the name of law enforcement. It could hardly be suggested that such carry bans did not violate the right to bear arms simply because judicial decisions about them are lacking. A poor cowboy riding into town who failed to check his firearm with the marshal in a timely manner, and whose pittance of wages was taken for the fine, would hardly even think of or be in a position to locate and to retain an attorney to appeal to the jurisdiction's highest court. Civil rights attorneys were hardly in abundance, and high-minded public interest law firms were not to be found in these dusty cow towns.

"One commentator notes of Old West carry bans that 'how well these laws were enforced and whether they were effective is difficult to say, and it is all but impossible to know precisely how prevalent they were.' Such laws were of dubious validity once the territories became states and thereafter adopted bills of rights."

From Halbrook, The Right to Bear Arms, pgs. 256-257.

19 1
If you're in the Lexington, Virginia area, I will be speaking at the Washington and Lee University School of Law this coming Tuesday, October 27, 2026, at 1:00 p.m. My topic is “The Second Amendment in 1776 and 2026.”
.
.
.
#wlulaw #stephenhalbrook #2ahistory #2ndamendmenthistory #secondamendmenttoday

8 1
"During 1787-88, John Adams published his Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America. He approved of Aristotle's ideal 'to place the use of and exercise of arms in the people, because the commonwealth is theirs who hold the arms. . . .' Adams recognized the individual right to use arms for personal protection, but looked askance at the kind of armed protest recently exemplified in Shays' Rebellion: 'To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, counties, or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man -- it is a dissolution of the government.' "

From Halbrook, The Right to Bear Arms: A Constitutional Right of the People or a Privilege of the Ruling Class?, p. 161 (hardback edition).

Painting: "Escape" by Andrew Knez Jr. 
.
.
.
#johnadams #foundingfather #Aristotle #ShaysRebellion #therighttobeararmshalbrook

25 0
I recently visited Omaha Beach in Normandy, France.

On June 6, 1944, thousands of American soldiers landed here as part of the Allied invasion of Nazi-occupied Europe. Many never made it off the beach.

Standing on that sand was a powerful reminder of their courage, sacrifice, and the price of freedom.

Photos: The Les Braves sculpture honors the courage of the Allied soldiers who landed here. The nearby Signal Monument commemorates the American servicemen who fought and died during the Normandy landings.
.
.
.
#OmahaBeachNormandy #omahabeachmemorial #WorldWarIIhistory #LesBraves #SignalMonument

36 2
"On October 15, I published a post arguing that true 'sensitive places' where guns are banned must have armed protection. The same day, a murderer broke into a 'gun-free-zone' school in Oregon and began shooting children and teachers. A dad of two girls at the school just happened to be driving by and grabbed his pistol, rushed into the school, and 'neutralized' the killer with several shots. He was a concealed pistol licensee."
...
"Just last year, Governor Kotek signed S.B. 243, the Community Safety Firearms Act, which her press release said 'will help prevent mass shooting events in Oregon.'..."

"As revised by S.B. 243, Oregon law makes it a felony to possess a firearm in a public building, but if the building is a school, it is an affirmative defense that the person has a concealed handgun license, in which case it is a misdemeanor. ORS 166.370(1), (3)(g). However, a district school board 'may adopt a policy providing that the affirmative defense … concerning persons licensed to carry a concealed handgun … does not apply to the possession of firearms on the grounds of the schools controlled by the board.' ORS 166.377(1). A board that adopts the policy must 'Post a clearly visible sign, at all normal points of entry to the school grounds subject to the policy….' Id.

"The only effect of this policy is to criminalize a concealed handgun licensee from possession of a handgun at a school....

"Only 25 of the 197 school districts in Oregon have adopted this policy....

"It also means that the brave community member who entered the school and ended the carnage would have violated the law, but for a 'choice-of-evils' justification defense...."

The above excerpts are from my Second Amendment Roundup blog post, "Saving Lives at Silver Rail Elementary" (10/19/26). 

Read the post at reason.com/volokh or copy and paste: https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/19/second-amendment-roundup-saving-lives-at-silver-rail-elementary/

Link can also be accessed through the home page of my website, stephenhalbrook.com
.
.
.
#concealedcarry #gunfreezone #oregongunlaws #silverrailelementary #secondamendmentroundup

18 0
"In the newspaper Memphis Free Speech and elsewhere, along with Rev. Taylor Nightingale, who advised his congregants to obtain Winchester rifles, [Ida] Wells urged members of the black community to defend themselves with arms. Their repeated references to the virtues of the Winchester, and the defensive use thereof by black communities, were well publicized and would have consequences.

"Perhaps in response to such incidents in which blacks defended themselves with effective arms, in 1893, Florida made it 'unlawful to carry or own a Winchester or other repeating rifle without first taking out a license from the County Commissioner'; only with a license would a person be 'at liberty to carry around with him on his person and in his manual possession' such a rifle. A license required a $100 bond from sureties to be approved by the county commissioner. That would be equivalent to $2,943 in 2021. The average monthly wage for farm labor in Florida in 1890 was $19.35. The law did what it was intended to do when it effectively excluded the poor and African Americans from legal gun ownership. In 1901, the law was amended to add pistols to the list of firearms requiring a license."

From Halbrook, America's Rifle: The Case for the AR-15, p. 153.
.
.
.
#AmericasRifleTheCaseForTheAR15 #idabwells #blackgunsmatter #winchesterrifle #armeddefense

59 0
Now that's a hat! This 1973 photo shows hunter Bill Van Houten looking out from a pit blind with a full Canada goose decoy rigged onto his cap. Geese have incredible vision, and the slightest movement of a human head will spook a circling flock. By wearing the decoy, any movement looked completely natural from above.

Back before high-tech layout blinds and modern camo patterns, hunters used their creativity to hide from their targets.
.
.
.
#duckdecoy #WaterfowlHunting #DuckHunting #GooseHunting #VintageHuntingphoto

34 0
"Dr. Angus McClellan has just posted 151 pages of 'Additional Research on Comprehensive Security and Sensitive Places' showing that at the Founding armed security was tied to each of Bruen's three sensitive places where arms could be restricted. Historical tradition from the American colonies and early states demonstrates that the predicate for banning weapons by the public at courts, legislative assemblies, and polling places was the government's provision of real protection in fact...."
...
"...McClellan states: 'The primary purpose of this additional research is to determine whether all 13 original colonies or early states had armed, government security personnel assigned to doorways at the sensitive places of courthouses/courtrooms, legislative buildings/chambers, and polling places.' A secondary purpose, he continues, is to confirm that courthouses, legislatures, and polling places were indeed 'sensitive,' i.e., governments could or did ban weapons there....The research compiles sources showing where bans were enacted with evidence that such places were secured.

"McClellan's research is truly overwhelming and is supported by hundreds of footnotes. Weapons were not necessarily always banned in the subject places, but they could be; the ultimate point is that these places were secured by government agents. I will mention only one entry illustrative of each of the identified sensitive places.

" 'Courthouses. At the trial of Aaron Burr, General James Wilkinson was disarmed in the court by the U.S. marshal to prevent him from intimidating the jury, indicating at least that (1) weapons were or could be banned in court, (2) government officers were present in court to disarm people....' "

The above excerpts are from my Second Amendment Roundup blog post, "Sensitive Places" Issue Coming to a Head? (10/15/26). 

Read the post at reason.com/volokh or copy and paste: https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/15/second-amendment-roundup-sensitive-places-issue-coming-to-a-head/

Link can also be accessed through the home page of my website, stephenhalbrook.com
.
.
.
#sensitiveplacesdoctrine #gunrestriction #firearmslaw #historyandtradition #secondamendmentroundup

12 0

Marathon & Triathlon Photos

Reykjavík Half-Marathon, 2019
Reykjavík, Iceland

Jungfrau Marathon, 2004
Jungfrau, Switzerland

Marine Corps Marathon
Washington, D.C.

Alcatraz Triathlon, 2001
San Francisco, California

Berlin Marathon, 2019
Berlin, Germany

Berlin Marathon, 2017
Berlin, Germany